WikiSummary, the Social Science Summary Database

Smith: The levels of conceptualization

From WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database


Smith. 1980. The levels of conceptualization: False measures of ideological sophistication. American Political Science Review 74: 685-.

General Problem

Campbell et al (1960) proposed a notion of "levels of conceptualization," using four levels. Some people think about politics at the highest level (ideology, broad principles), while others think only in narrow, issueless terms ("Bush is a nice guy"). In the middle, some people think mostly in terms of group benefits and such.

In response, several authors later proposed measurement schemes to quickly classify survey respondents according to their level of conceptualization. This article addresses two common measures, and finds that neither is reliable or valid. In fact, these measures don't reflect how people evaluate politics at all; they only reflect the changing words we use to explain our evaluations.

The Two Measurement Schemes

Field and Anderson (1969) have three levels of evaluation, Nie, Verba, and Petrocik (1976) have seven. Any survey respondent should have a stable level of conceptualization over time, since (the theory says) that cognitive abilities are a key determinant of one's level. However, Smith uses panel data from 1956 and 1960 to show that the 'same' respondents have very different levels of conceptualization in the two different years (see pg 689 for tables). The correlations between 1956 and 1960 are much lower than we would expect (in the 0.2-0.3 range).

What We Are Really Measuring

Thus, he concludes that these measurement schemes aren't reliable. They aren't measuring people's enduring level of sophistication (which Smith does believe exists, even though he thinks we aren't measuring it well); they're only measuring how we talk about evaluations. When a surveyor asks you to explain why you support a person or policy, you just spit back something you've heard in the news lately, or something recent that is on your mind; thus, what you say can suggest a different level of sophistication than what you really have.