WikiSummary, the Social Science Summary Database

McCubbins and Thies: As a matter of factions

From WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database

This summary needs formatting (i.e. "wikification"). Can you help us improve it? (Formatting help.) Please volunteer.

McCubbins and Thies. 1997. As a matter of factions: The budgetary implications of shifting factional control in Japan's LDP. LSQ (August).

The model: Simple agenda setting model.

Formal hypothesis: If the factional composition of the LDP mainstream changes from year t1 to year t2, then the amount of money allocated to various programs in the national budget will change as a result, other things equal.

Y = budget decisions [logged year-to-year change in spending for individual budgetary items from 1961 through 1984]

X = change in factional composition of the LDP mainstream

Control for economic growth and unemployment [logged growth in GNP, unemployment rate for previous year]; LDP popularity [opinion polls]; and LDP popularity in election years [opinion polls]. To control for first-order serial correlation in the error matrix, added the lagged dependent variable. Specify effects of coalition change with dummy variables for each faction.


I. Adding a given faction to a given proto-coalition affected policy outcomes 33% of the time.

II. Pork-barrel was affected least often (2/13); public goods the most (6/13) and semi-public goods (5/13). Consistent with the prevailing wisdom that pork is important in Japanese politics; hence not likely to change much across coalitions.

III. (preliminary) Presence of Kishi, when it matters, results in spending increases. Kono and Miki: spending cuts. Ikeda: nothing consistent.