Lupia: Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of informationFrom WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database Lupia. 1992. Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. APSR 86:390-403.
[edit] In BriefLupia seeks to explain how referenda work. There's no parties, so we rely almost exclusively on cues from interest groups (who read all the propositions and tell us how we should vote). If we know which interest groups we can trust, then we follow their advice. [edit] The Argument[edit] The GameThere is a monopolistic agenda setter who proposes a referendum for a new policy. The agenda setter has complete knowledge. The voters have varying levels of information about the setter's preferences (see Table on p 392). Voters have complete information about the status quo, however. [edit] Lemmas (Some)
[edit] Main Predictions
[edit] Data and EvidenceNone. This is a formal model. [edit] Future Research Proposals
[edit] Comments and Criticisms
Related Reading The following summaries link (or linked) to this one: Keywords: Authors/Lupia, Arthur - Political Science - American Politics - Voting - Information - Agenda Control - State Politics (U.S.) - Direct Democracy |
– Toolbox Ads by Google Please report inappropriate ads. We do not endorse services that facilitate plagiarism. |