WikiSummary, the Social Science Summary Database

Kahler: Evolution, choice, and international change

From WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database

 

Kahler. 1999. Evolution, choice, and international change. In Strategic Choice, eds. Lake and Powell, pp. 165-196.

There are different kinds of evolutionary theories. "Hard" Darwinism stresses that biological variations are random, and that the environment selects some variants to succeed (natural selection). Lamarckian theories allow that organisms might respond to environmental demands and adapt to meet them. Kahler seeks to apply evolutionary theories to IR to explain institutional evolution.

In IR, we need to strike a balance between recognizing that actors can think (i.e. they don't act randomly) and recognizing that the environment exerts selective pressures. Often we focus too hard on one or the other. This chapter spends quite a bit of time discussing issues related to this balance.

Kahler holds up Spruyt as a good example of applying evolutionary theory. For Spruyt, three institutional forms responded (in a Lamarckian style) to the growth of trade, the city-state, the city-league, and territorial states. Three different kinds of selective pressures led states to emerge as the dominant institutional form (only the first is an environmental pressure). First, states' internal organization made them better at mobilizing resources for war. Second, mutual empowerment gave states a boost: states preferred to work with similarly-organized units. Third (really two mechanisms), "competition may spur imitation of more successful institutional forms ... and accelerate the exit of social actors from less successful units."

Kahler praises Spruyt (also Tilly) for their work with evolutionary theories. "The design of their arguments fits the broad definition of an evolutionary model given by Richard Nelson: an explantion of the movement of a variable across time; a means of generating variation and a mechanism for winnowing on that variation; and 'inertial forces' that provide 'constancy' in the survivors" (191).