WikiSummary, the Social Science Summary Database

Brown: Party cleavages and welfare effort in the American states

From WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database

 
This summary needs formatting (i.e. "wikification"). Can you help us improve it? (Formatting help.) Please volunteer.

Brown. 1995. Party cleavages and welfare effort in the American states. American Political Science Review 89: 23-34.

Scholars have found inconclusive results when studying whether Democratic control of the state government correlates with higher welfare spending. Brown points out that scholars have neglected an important variable: the nature of each state's cleavage system.

X: STATE PARTY CLEAVAGES

Using a novel technique, Brown shows which cleavages matter most in most states (see Table 2, pg 26). He then identifies three ideal types (see Table 3, pg 28):

  • Southern partisan cleavage: driven primarily by race, but also low-income and rural support for Democrats.
  • New Deal cleavage (class-based): driven primarily by a Catholic-Protestant split, but also income, unionization, education, and sex.
  • Post-New Deal cleavage: essentially, a majority vs minority cleavage, with the Democratic party a strange coalition of many "out" groups (blacks, Catholics, urbanites, unions, low income, female, Jewish).
  • A few states have no significant cleavages (Arkansas, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Wyoming)

Y: STATE WELFARE EFFORT

Hypothesis: States with a class-based (New Deal) cleavage will spend the most on welfare.

CONTROLS

State resources (income per capita vs size of welfare-receiving population), elite values (the liberalism of those in government), and racism (which is poorly measured; see below).

RESULTS

See Table 4, pg 30, for regression results. "New Deal" is the baseline category. Thus:

  • New Deal states: Party control has a +0.00039 (significant) effect on welfare effort
  • Southern states: Party control has +0.00007 (insignificant) effect (0.00039 - 0.00032 = 0.00007)
  • Post-New Deal states: Party contrl has a +0.00004 (insignificant) effect (0.00039 - 0.00035 = 0.00004)

IN ENGLISH: The effect of party control is 9.5 times greater in New Deal states than in post-New Deal states, and 5.5 times stronger in New Deal states than in Southern states. All predictions are borne out.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

  • Uses a pooled cross sectional regression (combines data from different surveys from 1976-85), which presents risks of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation (i.e. inflated results). Claims to control for this.
  • In an effort to control for a state's "population's attitude toward [black] welfare recipients," Brown includes "a variable for the percentage of the state's population that is black" (29-30). What on earth?!!?