WikiSummary, the Social Science Summary Database

Atkeson and Partin: Candidate Advertisemens, media coverage, and citizen attitudes

From WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database

 
For discussion of the most recent research visit our sister site, AbstractPolitics.com!

Atkeson and Partin. 2001. Candidate advertisements, media coverage, and citizen attitudes: Agendas and roles of Senators and governors. Political Research Quarterly.

Overview

Federalism serves as a cue (or, as the authors say, a "frame") by which we understand which policy issues a candidate should discuss. National candidates (Senators) can discuss redistribution (Social Security, Medicaid) and national security; state candidates (governors) can discuss development (economy, education, transportation, crime/drugs, environment). This federal frame determines (1) what candidates say, (2) what the media say, and (3) what voters think.

Hypotheses and Methods

H1: Campaign ads

  • Hyp: Senators will run advertisements discussing national concerns and redistribution, governors will run advertisements discussing development.
  • Test: Sample 1986 Senate and gubernatorial races. Collect all TV ads from sampled races. Code whether they discuss an issue.

H2: News coverage

  • Hyp: Newspapers will discuss national concerns and redistribution when covering Senate campaigns; they will cover developmental concerns when covering gubernatorial campaigns.
  • Test: Sample four states that had both a Senate and gubernatorial race in 1986. Cover news coverage in the largest paper for each state and see which issues are mentioned in articles about particular candidates.

H3: Voter perceptions

  • Hyp: Voters will assign responsibility for national concerns to Senators; they will assign responsibility for development concerns to governors.
  • Test: A survey in New Mexico. Ask respondents to assign responsibility for each issue to either the governor ("1" on a seven-point scale), the Senator ("7" on the scale), or shared ("4") on the scale.

Findings

  • See Table 2. It's a logit to predict whether the candidate was for Senate (Y=0) or governor (Y=1). Most coefficients are highly significant.
  • See Table 4. Shows that voters do assign responsibility for issues either to governor or Senator.