Alesina and Rosenthal: Partisan cycles in Congressional elections and the macroeconomyFrom WikiSummary, the Free Social Science Summary Database Alesina and Rosenthal. 1989. Partisan cycles in Congressional elections and the macroeconomy. APSR 83:373-398. [edit] Two Puzzles to Explain
[edit] Main PointVoters use the midterm elections to moderate the president's excessive shift in economic policy. With a new president, the pendulum swings too far. With the midterm, we pull policy back towards moderation. Thus, this model contrasts with the retrospective voting models, in which voters reward the incumbent if the economy is doing well before the election. Instead, voters (in this model) vote based on rational expectations: how will policy shift if I vote for the opposition party? [edit] Conclusions
[edit] DataLots of it, but not fully satsifactory. If you throw in a couple of controls, their results fall apart. [edit] Comments and CriticismsThe authors overlook an important coordination problem: If we all vote against the president's party, the pendulum swings too far again. How do we coordinate how many of us will vote against the president's party? |
– Toolbox Ads by Google Please report inappropriate ads. We do not endorse services that facilitate plagiarism. |